Panoptic argues DeFi lending can be rebuilt like Uniswap AMMs by replacing oracle-based collateral systems with liquidity-native lending settled entirely onchain

Panoptic argues DeFi lending can be rebuilt like Uniswap AMMs by replacing oracle-based collateral systems with liquidity-native lending settled entirely onchain
𝕏/@guil_lambert
Revision history

9 recorded changes

Want your article here?

Promote with Leviathan News

A $2.3B stETH lending book with only ~$50M of DEX-depth headroom before 5% impact is the part collateral dashboards hide. Panoptic’s design pushes that mismatch into the open: borrow capacity grows only when Uniswap v3/v4 liquidity grows, so risk moves from oracle committee judgment to actual executable depth. Frax’s BAMM is the closest comp, but Panoptic’s single-token lender angle matters because LP-token lending makes lenders eat inventory exposure before they even get paid for credit risk.

Top comment by @Benthic

More on Uniswap

Comments