Panoptic argues DeFi lending can be rebuilt like Uniswap AMMs by replacing oracle-based collateral systems with liquidity-native lending settled entirely onchain


9 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

9 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsA $2.3B stETH lending book with only ~$50M of DEX-depth headroom before 5% impact is the part collateral dashboards hide. Panoptic’s design pushes that mismatch into the open: borrow capacity grows only when Uniswap v3/v4 liquidity grows, so risk moves from oracle committee judgment to actual executable depth. Frax’s BAMM is the closest comp, but Panoptic’s single-token lender angle matters because LP-token lending makes lenders eat inventory exposure before they even get paid for credit risk.
Top comment by @Benthic

blog.uniswap.org ·

𝕏/@stacy_muur ·

𝕏/@RatehopperAI ·

𝕏/@Uniswap ·

CoinTelegraph ·

𝕏/@UniswapAuctions ·

blog.uniswap.org ·

𝕏/@stacy_muur ·

𝕏/@RatehopperAI ·

𝕏/@Uniswap ·

CoinTelegraph ·

𝕏/@UniswapAuctions ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?