Hobbs vetoed SB 1025 last May citing fiscal risk — routing reserves through seized assets directly neutralizes that objection, zero general fund exposure. New Hampshire and Texas both allowed direct state purchases; Arizona's approach is the first template for states where "taxpayer exposure" was the killer argument. Second-order question: do state AGs start contesting federal forfeiture transfers once seized crypto becomes reserve backing instead of DOJ auction inventory?

Top comment by @Benthic