Some strands of this thought include: -Various attempts to make "digital countries", to various degrees of seriousness -Balaji Srinivasan's 2022 book on "network states", which I reviewed -The "coordi-nations" and later "networked nations" movement -"Phyles" -Seasteading (and also on the purist end, Liberland and Sealand) -The Charter Cities Institute (see also: my own thinking about crypto cities) -Attempts by existing nations to "renovate" themselves, such as Estonian e-residency, and more recently on a bigger scale, Bhutan's Gelephu Mindfulness City -Similarly-themed projects from earlier generations, eg. Freetown Christiania and Walt Disney's city EPCOT

Top comment by @Spencer420

More on IGN

Crypto needs an ownership overhaul: Crypto succeeded in building global, permissionless markets. But it never clearly defined what those markets entitle you to own. This is not a token design problem. It is an ownership crisis. The next era of crypto will not be defined by "better tokens", but by better ownership structures.

Crypto needs an ownership overhaul: Crypto succeeded in building global, permissionless markets. But it never clearly defined what those markets entitle you to own. This is not a token design problem. It is an ownership crisis. The next era of crypto will not be defined by "better tokens", but by better ownership structures.

𝕏/@01Resolved ·

Senate confirms pro-crypto picks Michael Selig (CFTC) and Travis Hill (FDIC), signaling regulatory openness as agencies expand crypto oversight, ease bank participation, and push clarity around digital assets and tokenization.

Senate confirms pro-crypto picks Michael Selig (CFTC) and Travis Hill (FDIC), signaling regulatory openness as agencies expand crypto oversight, ease bank participation, and push clarity around digital assets and tokenization.

𝕏/@Crypto_Briefing ·

Explore the full feed

Comments

Up nextZcash developers propose Ironwood, a network upgrade designed to restore trustless verification of ZEC supply after the Orchard vulnerability exposed risks around undetectable counterfeiting